The real lesson here is that current science and news publications set the bar far higher for studies showing the risks and harms of circumcision than they do for lame, unfounded claims touting the “benefits” of removing healthy body parts from babies who are many years away from being sexually active.
Pro-circumcision bias in the media? I definitely think so.
-
life-intact reblogged this from i-am-disfigured
-
i-am-disfigured reblogged this from legalizeforeskin
-
i-am-disfigured likes this
-
damegreywulf reblogged this from legalizeforeskin
-
legalizeforeskin posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus
